The Australia Letter is a weekly publication from our Australia bureau. Sign up to get it by electronic mail. This week’s challenge is written by Yan Zhuang, a reporter for the Australia bureau.

Former Australian prime minister Bob Hawke definitely by no means referred to as the Queen “a pig” dressed “in twin set and pearls.” There is no evidence that Princess Diana ever called Uluru “Ayers Dock,” and no, Brisbane does not look like Spain.

These are only a few of the issues that Australians watching “The Crown” had been fast to level out after episode six of the wildly-popular collection, which centered round Charles and Diana’s go to to Australia in 1983 to counter a rising republican motion within the nation spearheaded by Mr. Hawke. The extra sophisticated query in recalling the go to is that this: Why did a rustic that prides itself on its egalitarianism and giving everybody a “honest go” resolve to keep up a proper connection to the British monarchy then, and why is it nonetheless the case now?

Formally talking, Australia is a constitutional monarchy, which implies the Queen is the pinnacle of state. In keeping with the royal household’s web site, when the Queen visits Australia, she speaks and acts as Queen of Australia, and never as Queen of the UK.

Different former English colonies have an identical setup (Jamaica, for instance) however Australia is the most important and most distant of the Queen’s realms, and for some motive, appears to wish to preserve it that manner.

The final main push to make Australia a republic was greater than 20 years in the past. A referendum to present the facility of selecting Australia’s head of state to the Australian parliament was narrowly defeated in a referendum in 1999 with 45 p.c of Australians voting in favor and 55 p.c in opposition to.

“Australia is a rustic that’s republican in spirit,” mentioned Mark McKenna, a historian and republicanism scholar from the College of Sydney. “It’s egalitarian, democratic, it believes in advantage earlier than background, standing, class. But it surely’s been unable to make its constitutional preparations mirror the tenor and values of its society.”

So what’s stopping it?

In the real interview the one in “The Crown” relies on, Hawke says: “I consider we’d be higher off as a republic however I don’t assume it’s a matter of nice significance.”

He was extra involved in regards to the points going through bizarre Australians, “and if we grew to become a republic tomorrow it wouldn’t enhance their situation one iota.”

And that appears to be the perspective of most supporters of republicanism in Australia: let’s preserve it on the again burner whereas we take care of extra fast points.

Even after I was a member of my college’s republican membership (extra out of a need totally free pizza reasonably than any type of fervent want to advance the trigger) the sensation was: Why speak about republicanism once we may very well be speaking about, say, scholar welfare or inequality?

Louis Devine, the previous president of our membership who now sits on the Victorian committee of the Australian Republic Motion, agrees that’s a part of it — though he argues that folks can multitask, and that symbols nonetheless carry weight.

The opposite motive “why there’s that curiosity however not ardour is as a result of most individuals are likely to assume it’s inevitable,” he says. And inevitability results in inaction.

Lack of ardour might also have one thing to do with the truth that the query of republicanism has traditionally been framed as one thing exterior to us, a query of what we don’t wish to be, mentioned Professor McKenna. That’s not a very inspiring message.

“The republic has to imply extra than simply severance,” he mentioned. “It must be a much bigger query about our relationship with the nation, the land, each other, and the place of Indigenous Australians.”

He added that constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians must be central to the dialog.

One other problem is in convincing Australians to put extra significance on the structure than they at present do. In the US, the structure and its language are central to nationwide id and phrases like “the second modification” and “constitutional rights” get thrown round repeatedly.

“Australia is the reverse,” Professor McKenna mentioned. “Australia is a rustic which doesn’t connect its id to its structure in any actually highly effective manner.”

Sandy Biar, the nationwide director of the Australian Republic Motion, additionally famous a extra private motive that many Australians favor holding onto the monarchy. They keep a passion for Queen Elizabeth.

“For many individuals she’s been there for his or her complete lives,” he mentioned. “They really feel a robust sense of non-public affinity and have felt, for essentially the most half, that she’s held the workplace with dignity and managed to embody the kin of virtues of a head of state they’d prefer to see.”

In “The Crown,” Bob Hawke expresses hope that Charles and Diana’s journey going badly would be the flashpoint Australia must shake off the monarchy. The hope now could be that when Charles takes over, it is going to set off one other flashpoint that may “remind folks we’re not as constitutionally unbiased as we expect we’re,” Mr Biar mentioned.

How do you’re feeling about an Australian republic? Tell us at nytaustralia@nytimes.com.